He puts a curse on them, which leads to a Russian uprising that ends up killing the family. In the film, Rasputin is said to be РІР‚Сљconsumed by his hatredРІР‚Сњ for the Romanovs and sells his soul to make sure they donРІР‚в„ўt live to see another day. Moviepilot reported that after the Romanovs were executed, Anastasia and her sisters were found wearing necklaces with RasputinРІР‚в„ўs picture.

What is true, though, is that Rasputin and the Romanovs had a close relationship. As of now, the letter has not been found, perhaps because it was lost or maybe, it was never written. But, The Odyssey questions whether this letter from Rasputin actually existed. It was deemed an act of patriotism being that many Russians thought Rasputin was a bad influence on the tzar. This ended up being true: Rasputin was killed in 1916, murdered by Felix Yusupov, the husband of Tsar Nicholas IIРІР‚в„ўs only niece, a Romanov by marriage.

According to RT, Rasputin sent a letter to Nicholas in 1916 predicting his own death at the hands of a member of the Romanov family. Rasputin, who had a reputation for being a promiscuous, heavy-drinker, may have had some psychic powers, though. РІР‚СљRasputinРІР‚в„ўs assurances calmed the anxious, fretful mother and filled her with unshakeable confidence,РІР‚Сњ he wrote, РІР‚Сљand she, in turn, transferred this confidence to her ailing son, literally willing him back to health.РІР‚Сњ In the 2016 book, Rasputin: Faith, Power and the Twilight of the Romanovs, author Douglas Smith wrote that it was RasputinРІР‚в„ўs confidence that helped the young boy. Whether Rasputin, nicknamed the РІР‚СљMad Monk,РІР‚Сњ really had powers is disputable. While Grigori Rasputin is depicted as an enemy and a traitor to the Romanovs in the film, IRL the controversial holy man, was a friend and advisor to Tsar Nicholas II, who urged him to look for peaceful resolutions with his enemies.Р”Р„ccording to Smithsonian Magazine, Rasputin was known as a healer, who helped Nicholas II and his wife AlexandraРІР‚в„ўs only son AlexeiРІР‚в„ўs hemophilia. The real story of Anastasia is a tragic one that doesn't seem fit for a feel-good family movie, yet, with a few changes it does. She had not escaped, but had lost her life too soon. One, that would be debunked in 2009 thanks to DNA evidence, which proved that Anastasia's body was buried alongside the rest of her family. This movie is actually based on Anna Anderson, who was the most infamous Anastasia imposter, which means the film was actually built on a lie. Many people hoped that Anastasia had escaped, being that at the time of the assassination the Russian government never confirmed the deaths of the tsar's five children.Р”Р„dding to the mystery was the fact that many young women claimed to be the real Anastasia. In 1918, the young heiress was murdered alongside her entire family. For starters, the true story of Anastasia, the daughter of Russian Tsar Nicholas II, doesn't end happily ever after, but in tragedy. ItРІР‚в„ўs not just the little details that the animated movie fudges, but the big ones, too. On the 20th anniversary of Anastasia, though, the question is how many liberties? After fact-checking Anastasia, it's clear that the animated film took creative liberties and then some. The mystery and myth surrounding the life (and death) of Anastasia Romanov sounds straight out of a movie, but, even still, the 1997 animated film decided to take creative liberties with her story.

Is the movie 300 accurate